Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs. iPhone 13 Samsung created the coolest foldable phone when it introduced its Galaxy Z Flip 4; however, is it as foldable as it’s claimed to be? If you’re looking for a new smartphone, is it worth going bendy with Samsung or sticking to the reliable Apple model, such as the iPhone 13?

Samsung’s most loved phone and Apple’s most bendable phone are in our top 10 list of top phones to purchase (only one is in the top foldables, naturally). Do you think Samsung’s Samsung worth the price of folding, or should you go with Apple’s reliability? We’ve got the answer.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 is the most accessible Samsung foldable phone. It’s a lot of power, but the camera performance could be better. The foldable design makes it stand out, making the phone an even more enjoyable experience than you’d think.

The iPhone 13 is still available as a brand new model and has the identical Apple A15 as the iPhone 14. This screen’s size may be smaller than Galaxy Z Flip 4. However, it’s incredibly sharp and clear. The iPhone 13 gives you iconic iPhone style and performance but at a lower cost.

Galaxy Z Flip 4 vs. iPhone 13

Prices and availability

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 pricing starts at $899.99 or PS999/AU$1,499 for 128GB. Prices increase to $1,059.99 or PS1,059/AU$1,649 for 128GB. There’s also a 512GB version priced at $1,179.99 or PS1,199/AU$1,849

Then there’s the iPhone 13, which was still within Apple’s lineup even after the iPhone 14 range was unveiled. Prices start at $699 or PS749 / AU$1,229 on the basic 128GB model and go up to $899/PS859 / 1,399 AUD for 256GB models and $1,099/PS1,079 / $AU$1,749 for 512GB models.

Apple phones rarely appear to be an excellent value, especially compared to Samsung’s foldable phone. The last model of the iPhone 13 is much cheaper even though you enjoy the performance of this year’s model thanks to Apple’s Apple A15 Bionic chipset.

Samsung frequently offers free upgrades to storage and an enhanced trade value. The price of the phone you’re interested in might be lower. It would help if you looked into the retail stores and the pricing of the phones you want to purchase.


The phones appear similar to the top-of-the-line models. They are the Galaxy Z Flip 4. Galaxy Z Flip 4 is the most recent folding phone from Samsung that was announced in August, along with Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 4.

iPhone 13 was last year’s model. However, you’ll require a magnifying lens to see the distinctions between it and the more recent iPhone 14, even on the inside. Apple has altered the iPhone’s design a minimally from its predecessor, the iPhone X, and the iPhone 13 is immediately recognizable by its flat front and tapered sides.

The Galaxy Z Flip 4 is a unique phone that folds, and if you’ve yet to have a smartphone that folds before now, we suggest you try it in a retail store before returning it. This fold brings a different experience to daily usage and is a great experience.

Samsung’s folding Galaxy Z Flip 4 pulls off an incredible performance in terms of size when compared to iPhone 13. iPhone 13. It can accommodate a bigger screen but feels like a smaller device. It’s not because it folds into an incredibly compact device, but it can make it feel smaller. It’s also because the Galaxy Z Flip is very thin in its open state, which means it’s a thin device, no matter how it’s bent.

Samsung protects its phones with Gorilla Glass Victus Plus, and iPhone 13 uses a custom Ceramic Shield that mixes nano-ceramic crystals inside the glass. It’s said to be more durable than regular display glass. There’s a wrinkle that appears on the Samsung display. However, you won’t notice it. We haven’t felt any discomfort from the touch of it.

Apple also gets points with its IP68 certification. This means it’s also water-resistant. However, it’s far more dust-resistant than Samsung’s IPX8-approved Galaxy Z Flip 4. This “X” is a substitute for what dust protection should be, which is why Samsung hasn’t even endorsed this phone against dust.

Apple and Samsung use different methods to authenticate biometrics. Samsung’s iPhone 13 has Apple’s advanced Face ID system, whereas Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 4 uses an old-fashioned front-mounted system for fingerprints.

Both are tested and tried methods, and the winner will depend on your preferences. The Apple Face ID notch is 20 percent smaller than the previous version and is much more intrusive than Samsung’s subdued hole-punch camera.


Its Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 could be a tiny rectangular thing when closed, but it can fold out into a phone that is full size. Its 6.7-inch display is comparable in dimensions with the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s screen compared to the iPhone 13, which has a 6.1-inch display.

Both use OLED technology, meaning they’re equally vibrant and accurate to color. The display of the iPhone 13 is larger and has a resolution of 2532 pixels, 170 pixels versus 2640 1080 x 2640. With the differences in size, this is 460ppi for the iPhone and 426ppi for the Flip 4 Flip 4

This is a fairly subtle distinction when you think about the details. What’s more important is the issue of the screen’s refresh rate, which is Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip’s 60Hz right up increasing to a whopping 60Hz. That means you can see that the Flip 4’s main display appears more smooth than iPhone’s when scrolling through content and rendering the game.

The Galaxy Z Flip 4 has another advantage: another display on the device’s exterior, although it’s a bit of a flop. The 1.9-inch Cover Display has a 260x 524 resolution and 60Hz refresh speed. It serves primarily as a viewfinder to take superior selfies with the camera in the main phone instead of the selfie camera. Also, you can get notifications for heads-ups when the phone is shut.


Both phones have a pair of 12MP cameras, one for normal wide shots and the other for ultra-wide photos.

For both models, Samsung has added a larger sensor from earlier models. In the case of Galaxy Z Flip 4, which is an increase of 65% in brightness compared to that of the Flip 3, the iPhone 13 sensor pulls in 47 percent more light than the iPhone 12.

Compared to one another, the other Flip 4 main sensor is larger, with 1.8um pixels, compared to the iPhone 13’s 1.7um. Samsung’s system also has enhanced OIS (optical image stabilization) and VDIS (video digital image stabilization) capabilities compared to prior.

Like fingerprint security on phones feature, even though there are some distinct distinctions, your best snapper will likely be based on individual preference rather than evidence-based superiority.

iPhone 13 takes phenomenal images in various lighting conditions, probably assisted by its advanced sensor-shift stabilization system derived directly from the last year’s costly iPhone 12 Pro Max. Our reviewer described shooting using the iPhone 13 as “a fantastic point-and-shoot shooting experience.”

The Flip 4 lacks the dynamic range that is as wide as the iPhone; however, it makes up the difference with higher resolution, better low-light photography, and more creative shooting options, particularly when considering FlexCam mode, which takes advantage of its folding design.

In terms of selfies, Apple gives you another camera with 12MP, while Galaxy Z Flip 4 comes with a 10MP sensor. Galaxy Z Flip 4 goes with a 10-megapixel sensor. Its Galaxy Z Flip 4 makes it simple to use the camera’s main sensor for selfies. The Cover Display functions as an optical viewfinder.

Despite all the talk about the hardware, the software has the upper hand over smartphone cameras. Samsung prefers an extremely saturated look, whereas Apple’s style is more natural or blue. Both give you greater control than before. However, they let you change the focus in the opposite direction about the overall style of your photos.

Performance and specifications

Samsung has fitted its Galaxy Z Flip 4 with the fastest Qualcomm processor, which will be available by 2022, the Snapdragon 8 Plus Generation 1.

It’s quick and has Geekbench five multi-core scores that hover around 4300. This is a lot ahead of the Android competitors, even though iPhone 13 scored 4688. iPhone 13 scored 4688 on the same test. Apple A15 Bionic inside the iPhone 13 was so powerful that Apple utilized it for the following year’s iPhone 14.

Performance is always an issue for Android manufacturers when they compare their devices with the most recent iPhone. Apple’s processors are incredibly faster.

For fairness with Qualcomm, the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen1 indeed beats that of the A15 Bionic in a handful of GPU performance metrics. This is a far more competitive contest than we’ve seen in the past.

One of the biggest distinctions between Apple and Samsung devices is their software. Its iOS is always fast, clean, and fully in the loop with its hardware, but it’s also very restricted.

Samsung’s One UI is a weighty UI layer on top of Android 13 (at present, at least). It’s sleeker than iOS but is more packed with bloatware and slow animations; however, it’s more flexible. It’s mostly dependent on personal preference, and if you’re immersed in Apple’s ecosystem, you might feel trapped.


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4. Galaxy Z Flip 4 runs from a 3,700mAh battery which is an improvement (12 percent more) over the small 3,300mAh cell in Flip 3. Flip 3.

The Apple iPhone 13 runs on a 3,240mAh cell. This sounds like a major disadvantage; however, iOS utilizes its memory and power more efficiently and differently than Android, and the result is between apples and oranges.

As we looked over our review of the iPhone 13, we found that it was sporting the best endurance we’ve ever witnessed on an iPhone. We often ended with just 20% after a long day.

read more Nespresso Vertuo vs Nespresso Vertuo : which is the best ?

About Author